Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public asset management
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Public asset management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Jargon-filled article with obvious COI and poor sourcing; part of a string of promotional articles on various applications of the products of the undoubtedly very notable ESRI. there is nothing that sets this topic apart from the other articles on Asset Management especially Enterprise asset management & Infrastructure asset management, articles which probably need to be looked at also. I am not proposing a merge, because there's no mergeable content, and I'm not proposing a redirect, because its an unlikely search term. DGG ( talk ) 22:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vacation9 00:04, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; PR mud puddle. Or something of that ilk. WP:COI, etc. —Theopolisme (talk) 03:22, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The fact that ESRI is likely the dominant GIS system used by municipalities in the US doesn't change the fact that this article is largely about non-neutral POV pushing for an ESRI GIS-based asset management system for these institutions. The topic itself shows some hits in GScholar, for instance, [1] and [2], but none of these emphasizes GIS or ESRI. It is not clear to me that "public asset management" is a separate topic unto itself, and different from asset management as applied to public institutions. Perhaps best to start over, per WP:TNT. --Mark viking (talk) 04:42, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:TNT or WP:COATRACK. I can't tell if it's actually spam masquerading as a real article, because it's so poorly written. Bearian (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete spam MarioNovi (talk) 07:58, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.