Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Hammond (pornographic actor)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 02:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Jeff Hammond (pornographic actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No legitimate claim of notability included in article. All nontrivial GNews/GBooks hits appear to refer to different people. Prod removed by now-blocked disruptive sockpuppet as part of spree edits. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. czar · · 20:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails notability criteria WP:PORN and WP:GNG. Finnegas (talk) 21:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article was kept in the previous AfD on the grounds that Hammond is iconic and that the article was improved during the discussion. I find these arguments unconvincing without reliable sources. The sources added were unreliable and much of the article's content was poorly-sourced fluff that has since been removed. Fails GNG. My searches for RS coverage got only a passing mention at GayVN. No credible claim for passing PORNBIO without RS support. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a GNG fail and a "Citation Needed" circus. Carrite (talk) 02:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because it fails PORN and GNG. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:43, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no claim of notability. Cavarrone 09:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.