- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 18:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Pingler.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A seven-employee firm. I don;t see how it can possibly be notable. , and the article provides no evidence to show otherwise. DGG ( talk ) 09:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:A7 and/or WP:G11. All the sources are primary, listings, or blogs. A very small organisation purporting to be an SEO company, ostensibly trying do do their own SEO by using Wikipedia. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:36, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:39, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:40, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:41, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:ORG - this is what we get from too many paid editors. Dougweller (talk) 16:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.